Searching the Scientific Journals: Optimal Techniques for Enhancing Muscle Mass

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Email

Overview

Most of us recognize the importance of athletes and body builders gaining muscle mass; however, increasing muscle mass is just as important for fitness enthusiasts looking to improve body composition or aging individuals looking to sustain function and independence into their 60’s and beyond. The technical term for muscle growth is “fiber hypertrophy,” with fiber referring to the muscle cell itself and hypertrophy simply meaning “enlargement of.” The scientific community generally accepts that the only way to increase muscle size is through hypertrophy (increasing the size of existing fibers), as opposed to hyperplasia (the creation of new muscle fibers). And, while some exciting new research suggests that hyperplasia may, in fact, occur under certain circumstances, most of the existing research addresses the best methods for achieving hypertrophy.

When muscle fibers increase in size they simply store more protein internally (a process called accretion). The amount and rate at which protein is stored are primarily controlled by special hormones that circulate around the bloodstream and communicate with muscle fibers, telling them how much protein to store. These hormones are considered anabolic hormones because they are involved in tissue building. The three hormones critical to the process of muscle growth are testosterone, insulin, and growth hormone, and enhancing their release with the right type and amount of training can maximize muscle growth.

Scientific Research
Unfortunately, very few good systematic reviews of the optimal training parameters (sets, reps, intensity, rest interval, frequency, etc.) for muscle hypertrophy have been published. However, in 2007, an extensive literature review was published on training for muscle hypertrophy, which concluded the following: (1) the ideal training frequency for muscle growth is 2-3 days per week, per muscle; (2) the ideal training volume (reps per session) is between 40-80 per muscle group; and (3) the ideal training intensity is around 70-80% of one-rep max, which corresponds to about 8-12 repetitions per set (Wernborn et al, 2007).

Practical Implications
This literature review, as well as research from other leading experts in the field (Kraemer & Fleck, 2004. Willardson, 2006. Frye, 2004.), suggests that the ideal training program for muscle growth is one that trains each major muscle group 2-3 times per week (preferably separated by 48-72 hours), performing between 8-12 reps per set and 4-8 sets per muscle group. Exciting research on the relationship between rest interval length and muscle growth suggests that the optimal rest interval between sets be approximately one minute (Willardson, 2007). A protocol such as this maximizes anabolic hormone release and enhances protein storage in the muscle, thereby leading to optimal muscle growth when compared to other (heavy/fewer rep or lighter/more rep) training protocols.

About the Author:

  • Michael Stack is the founder & CEO of Applied Fitness Solutions and Frontline Fitness Pros. He is a faculty lecturer for the University of Michigan’s School of Kinesiology. He is also the creator and the host of the Wellness Paradox Podcast, produced in conjunction with University of Michigan.

    Michael is an exercise physiologist by training and a health entrepreneur, health educator, and fitness industry advocate by trade. He is dedicated to enhancing the standard of practice of, and advocating for, fitness and wellness professionals to ensure they become an essential constituent in the healthcare delivery system.

    With a career spanning over three decades in fitness, health, and wellness Michael has a deep knowledge of exercise physiology, health/wellness coaching, lifestyle interventions to mitigate chronic disease and leadership. He is credentialed through the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) as an Exercise Physiologist (ACSM-EP), Exercise is Medicine practitioner (ASCM-EIM), and a Physical Activity in Public Health Specialist (ACSM-PAPHS). Michael is a National Strength & Conditioning Association (NSCA) Certified Strength & Conditioning Specialist (CSCS), and a CDC Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) Lifestyle Coach.

    Michael received his undergraduate degree from the University of Michigan’s School of Kinesiology in 2004 and is currently a Master’s of Public Health (MPH) candidate at University of Michigan, with a specific concentration in health behavior and health education.

    Michael is a board of directors’ member for the Physical Activity Alliance and Michigan Fitness Clubs Association. He sits on the University of Michigan’s School of Kinesiology Alumni Board of Governors. Michael is an expert curriculum reviewer for the American College of Lifestyle Medicine. Finally, he is a member of the executive leadership team for American Heart Association’s Heart Walk.

    Michael lectures nationally for several health/fitness certification and continuing educations, including; IHRSA, the Medical Fitness Association, the National Strength & Conditioning Association, and SCW Fitness.

Trending Posts