Every year, more and more exercise videos, gimmicks and products hit the market. With ever-changing research, this is not always a bad thing. What we thought was “right” 30 years ago may be completely different today. With that said, there also are a lot of things related to fitness that we KNOW are not appropriate for many demographics (despite what popular media tells us). One of these things is plyometric exercise.
Plyometrics Defined:
First, let’s get one thing straight: plyometric exercise is not simply “jumping”. The purpose of plyometric exercise is to increase the power of subsequent movements by using both the natural elastic components of muscle and tendons, and something called the “stretch reflex”. Many programs try to incorporate “plyos” into their weight loss programs. This is not only dangerous but can be very irresponsible. Fitness professionals must be educated on the purpose of plyometric exercise before encouraging general population (non-athlete) clients to engage in these activities.
Plyometric drills involve maximal effort to improve ANAEROBIC POWER. Complete and adequate recovery time is required in order to maximize effectiveness. Drills should NOT be thought of as conditioning, but as explosive training. Because, by their nature, plyos are high quality/low quantity exercises, maximal calorie expenditure is not possible. These factors rule out the effectiveness of plyometric exercise for weight loss.
Precautions:
Program length, volume, and progression; as well as the individual’s age, strength, medical history, and experience should be taken into account before starting a plyometric training program. For lower body plyos, an athlete’s squat should be at least 1.5 times his or her body weight before implementing plyometrics. For upper body plyos, an athlete’s bench press should be at least 1-1.5 times the athlete’s body weight before implementing plyometrics. Most people looking to improve their overall body composition cannot safely reach these marks; thus, putting them at an increased risk for injury when attempting a plyometric training program.
In addition to the individual’s physical characteristics; landing surfaces, training area, equipment, footwear, and proper supervision all must be taken into consideration when attempting plyometric exercise. Home alone in your living room is not a safe or effective environment for this mode of exercise.
“Plyos” in weight loss:
That said, this does not mean jumping in a conditioning setting is an unsafe or ineffective way to train. Jumping allows you to eliminate the deceleration that takes place at the top of a movement (during a squat, lunge, push-up, etc.), thus activating a greater number of muscle fibers. Activation of a higher number of fibers means more calories burned. But as soon as your heel comes into contact with the ground, the movement is no longer explosive and is not considered “plyometric.”
Your focus while conditioning should not be the development of power. You should focus on a full range of motion, safe jump heights, soft landings, and continuous movements with minimal breaks. This is much different than what we view as “plyometrics.”
Final Thoughts:
Due to its explosiveness and the inability of non-athletes to perform it properly, plyometric exercise is not a safe modality to incorporate into your weight loss program. Understanding your goals is an important step to keep yourself and others safe on the workout floor!
About the Author:
-
Michael Stack is the founder & CEO of Applied Fitness Solutions and Frontline Fitness Pros. He is a faculty lecturer for the University of Michigan’s School of Kinesiology. He is also the creator and the host of the Wellness Paradox Podcast, produced in conjunction with University of Michigan.
Michael is an exercise physiologist by training and a health entrepreneur, health educator, and fitness industry advocate by trade. He is dedicated to enhancing the standard of practice of, and advocating for, fitness and wellness professionals to ensure they become an essential constituent in the healthcare delivery system.
With a career spanning over three decades in fitness, health, and wellness Michael has a deep knowledge of exercise physiology, health/wellness coaching, lifestyle interventions to mitigate chronic disease and leadership. He is credentialed through the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) as an Exercise Physiologist (ACSM-EP), Exercise is Medicine practitioner (ASCM-EIM), and a Physical Activity in Public Health Specialist (ACSM-PAPHS). Michael is a National Strength & Conditioning Association (NSCA) Certified Strength & Conditioning Specialist (CSCS), and a CDC Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) Lifestyle Coach.
Michael received his undergraduate degree from the University of Michigan’s School of Kinesiology in 2004 and is currently a Master’s of Public Health (MPH) candidate at University of Michigan, with a specific concentration in health behavior and health education.
Michael is a board of directors’ member for the Physical Activity Alliance and Michigan Fitness Clubs Association. He sits on the University of Michigan’s School of Kinesiology Alumni Board of Governors. Michael is an expert curriculum reviewer for the American College of Lifestyle Medicine. Finally, he is a member of the executive leadership team for American Heart Association’s Heart Walk.
Michael lectures nationally for several health/fitness certification and continuing educations, including; IHRSA, the Medical Fitness Association, the National Strength & Conditioning Association, and SCW Fitness.